Skip to main content

ISCHEMIA TRIAL


Background: We don't know the optimum mode of therapy for patients with stable ischemic heart disease along with moderate to severe myocardial ischemia on non-invasive stress testing. Routine early invasive therapy was compared with optimal medical therapy in this trial.

Study design:
Patients: Stable ischemic heart disease with moderate to severe ischemia on stress testing.

All patients underwent CT coronary angiogram prior to inclusion in the trial to rule out significant LM disease.

Exclusion:
- LM stenosis >50% (on CT coronary angiogram)
- Recent MI
- LVEF < 35%
- Unacceptable angina at baseline
- NYHA class III and IV heart failure
- Prior PCI or CABG within last one year

Groups: Routine invasive therapy (n = 2588) vs initial optimal medical therapy (n= 2591)

Interventions in both groups:
- Routine invasive group: Patients underwent angiography followed by PCI or CABG as per the anatomy.
- Medical therapy group: All patients were put on initial medical therapy and they underwent angiography only upon failure of medical therapy.

Mean duration of follow-up: 3.3 years

Outcomes:
- Primary outcome (composite of cardiovascular mortality, MI, or hospitalization for unstable angina or heart failure) at the end of the study period:
13.3% in routine invasive group vs. 15.5% in medical therapy group (p=0.34).
- Secondary outcomes:
Cardiovascular death or MI: Not different
All-cause mortality: Not different
Spontaneous MI: Not different

Clinical relevance:
- Routine invasive therapy did not reduce major adverse cardiac events (Myocardial infarction, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality) compared to the initial optimal medical therapy approach in patients with stable ischemic heart disease with moderate to severe ischemia on stress testing.
- The patients with recent ACS, highly symptomatic patients, significant left main disease, or severe LV dysfunction (LVEF < 35%) were excluded from the trial, so the results should not be extended to such patients.

Reference: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1915922

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ECG Spotter

What is the diagnosis? Click the button below to view answer: Show Answer

High heart rate

The patient contacts the doctor over phone with this report.   Obviously anxious because of his high heart rate (199 beats per minute) as detected by ECG machine.  Should he be worried about this and come to emergency department as soon as possible? Correct answer-  ECG machine has calculated his heart rate incorrectly.  Heart rate is around 100 beats per minute.  Other findings in this ECG include ST segment elevation in anterior chest leads along with presence of Q waves, denoting old MI changes with possibly development of LV aneurysm. In such cases, ST segment elevation can persist for long periods.    Now, should he come to emergency department? Not because of detection of high heart rate.  But, if he is having symptoms such as shortness of breath or chest pain, he should visit emergency department. Otherwise, if he is asymptomatic, he can schedule a regular visit with his cardiologist. 

Cardiology Multiple choice questions (MCQs)- Arrhythmia