Skip to main content

ISCHEMIA TRIAL


Background: We don't know the optimum mode of therapy for patients with stable ischemic heart disease along with moderate to severe myocardial ischemia on non-invasive stress testing. Routine early invasive therapy was compared with optimal medical therapy in this trial.

Study design:
Patients: Stable ischemic heart disease with moderate to severe ischemia on stress testing.

All patients underwent CT coronary angiogram prior to inclusion in the trial to rule out significant LM disease.

Exclusion:
- LM stenosis >50% (on CT coronary angiogram)
- Recent MI
- LVEF < 35%
- Unacceptable angina at baseline
- NYHA class III and IV heart failure
- Prior PCI or CABG within last one year

Groups: Routine invasive therapy (n = 2588) vs initial optimal medical therapy (n= 2591)

Interventions in both groups:
- Routine invasive group: Patients underwent angiography followed by PCI or CABG as per the anatomy.
- Medical therapy group: All patients were put on initial medical therapy and they underwent angiography only upon failure of medical therapy.

Mean duration of follow-up: 3.3 years

Outcomes:
- Primary outcome (composite of cardiovascular mortality, MI, or hospitalization for unstable angina or heart failure) at the end of the study period:
13.3% in routine invasive group vs. 15.5% in medical therapy group (p=0.34).
- Secondary outcomes:
Cardiovascular death or MI: Not different
All-cause mortality: Not different
Spontaneous MI: Not different

Clinical relevance:
- Routine invasive therapy did not reduce major adverse cardiac events (Myocardial infarction, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality) compared to the initial optimal medical therapy approach in patients with stable ischemic heart disease with moderate to severe ischemia on stress testing.
- The patients with recent ACS, highly symptomatic patients, significant left main disease, or severe LV dysfunction (LVEF < 35%) were excluded from the trial, so the results should not be extended to such patients.

Reference: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1915922

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ECG Spotter

What is the diagnosis? Click the button below to view answer: Show Answer

MCQ

 Cardiology MCQ Q. Which of the following leads is not an inferior lead in ECG? A. Lead II B. Lead III C. Lead aVF D. Lead aVR Click the button below to view answer Show answer Correct answer is option D. Lead aVR

Atrial tachycardia or atrial flutter

Educational post Please have a look at the ECG shown below. Is this atrial tachycardia or atrial flutter? Show answer ECG definition of atrial flutter is atrial rate more than 240 bpm and no isoelectric line between p waves. Atrial tachycardia will have rate between 120 to 240 bpm with clear isoelectric line between p waves. However, these two ECG criteria are not specific for any of them. Atrial tachycardia with higher heart rate is possible and atrial flutter with lower heart rate is possible. Atrial flutter may have an isoelectric line between p waves because of atriotomy scars causing conduction block. More important is to identify mechanism of atrial tachycardia during electrophysiological study. Electrophysiological study gives us a better idea regarding mechanism of atrial tachycardia. Atrial tachycardia can be focal or macroreentrant. Focal can be because of automaticity, triggered activity or microreentrant cause. Coming to this case, Here, atrial